data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d159/7d159eab19fd1df8d665cdbbe2a6007f3a5bc67c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82a88/82a88aae2a5aea49cff50371d538ad9f2f5184dc" alt=""
Offshore outsourcing is an emotive topic, and the security and privacy risks specific to offshoring can often be perceived, rather than real. Indeed, many companies have significant challenges managing security requirements with third parties regardless of location, writes Arabella Hallawell, research vice-president at Gartner.
There are multiple reasons for the challenges. First, typically security requirements are never detailed in contracts with third parties. Security is often brought in after the deal is negotiated, when requirements are difficult to put in after the fact.
Other companies have gone to the other extreme, and insisted on draconian, and expensive, measures for offshore outsourcers because of perceptions of elevating risks, often slowing down the process, and never implementing on-going assessments to ensure security controls agreed to, are actually instituted.
While there can be country-specific security challenges, typically related to the ability to conduct background checks, government track record of interception of data, or the IP protection landscape, most, with the exception of government interception, can be largely mitigated by additional security controls at the provider or within the organisation.
Companies with a well-defined process have a much better chance of protecting their business by putting in place a well-constructed process that includes: